GrapheneOS: Where Licenses Matter More Than People
I chose to write this.
Link removed
#GrapheneOS #Accessibility #FOSS #Blind #DisabilityTech #Inclusion #GPLv3 #espeak #a11y #Security #FreeSoftware #DisabilityRights #Android #Rant #TechShame
**update**: If you are using this post as some kind of call-to-action to harass and attack the GOS developers, please don't.
That damages everyone. You, them, and myself. It's not helpful.
**Update two**. I have made the decision to pull this post. It is not a good starting-point for a discussion, and just encourages defensiveness on both sides – when there really aren't sides here at all.
As a FOSS contributor, I am deeply ashamed at the way I approached this out of frustration.
@eckes@zusammenkunft.net@fireborn but, the Screen Reader can change its problematic license..
@eckes If it was only possible to get visual display output through a GPL v3 licensed component, would it be acceptable to say that that component should re-license to meet some arbitrary rules?
@eckes@zusammenkunft.net@fireborn (funfact, i know you mean something else, but nevertheless, that’s exactly what happend to the XFree project)
@eckes I’ll look this up. I like learning stuff, thanks